A Low GI Diet - Glycemic Index Search App Reviews

Fairly basic information, could use more food items to be more comprehensive.

Wish it had a more refined look to replace the old feel of the software.

I like the way it is layed out. Easy to read. Surprised to discover that it doesnt have any info on some of the veggies that I eat, which is kind of annoying. Other than that, so far so good.

Easy to look up information and extremely helpful for diabetics but also for anyone wanting to follow a healthy food intake. Thanks for the good job!

This is a totally useless and incorrect app!!!

Not very helpful. Not particularly user friendly

Enough clearly incorrect values that it brings the entire database under question. Not very useful for its intended purpose. Its also difficult to search specific items as you need to guess the way its listed in the database. eg: it wont find "cola", you need to search "soda - cola flavored" instead. Cant see myself using this much.

Japanese translation is terribly wrong. We payed but its easy to see the maker used google translation system or some. Pay back or translate again! 日本語ひどすぎて、全く意味がわからず役にたちません。

STILL CRASH ON MY 3GS!!! Please FIX the problem!!!!

It might be an interesting app. But it had been translated using google. Impossible to understand. Money wasted!

I love it. makes dealing w diabetes a breeze

Has the basic foods that individuals eat the most.

There are a lot of foods in the database, which is the good thing. However, the broad categories are nonsensical. Amaranth is a high gi food, while amaranth and wheat are low gi? Also, tacos with lettuce, meat and cheese are low gi, but tacos or tostadas with lettuce, meat and cheese are high. This app needs work.

The GI numbers are totally wrong. Cornflakes are at about 84, which this app complete misrepresents. Dont waste your money.

There are really too many inconsistencies in the data to make this app useful. A plain banana, for example, appears multiple times, and as both a high and low glycemic index food choice. It would be useful, if it were edited carefully, but currently it seems to be a mishmash of data from many conflicting sources.

Doesnt have GL for a lot of food and it seems some of the info is wrong. Which Id read the reviews first.

foods listed. It is very difficult to plan a meal when many ingredients are missing OR when the food choices are not varied. A good start; but requires more detail and diversity.

Very helpful and easy to use

Pretty good, search engine needs a little tweaking.

Data seems inconsistent...needs to be reviewed... Ex baked salmon & other types.....